Well it seems AE911 is sponsoring an "independent" research into the collapse of WTC7.
They found a professor in Alaska who is willing to model the collapse of WTC7. He is helped by 2 of his students who do all the work, and for few months they have been updating us via video on the work they are doing. The students also have been filling out diaries, which can be found in the 1.1 gig download on their website. In one of the diaries we can read that at the end of September, they were working on the report for WTC7, and the end date states October 2. So where is the report? It's January 2 now, and still no report.
Could this be another failure of AE911 truth to prove that it was an inside job?
Posts tonen met het label Richard Gage. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Richard Gage. Alle posts tonen
zaterdag 2 januari 2016
vrijdag 10 mei 2013
ANSYS Data and Blueprints received by AE911Truth
The last few weeks AE911truth keeps telling us that they never got any information to get a working model to model the WTC7 Collapse. But this is a blatant lie! They received ANSYS information from the first 16 floors in 2010.
http://cryptome.org/wtc-nist-wtc7-no.pdf
And yes, they may have withheld some information, Like the connection models, but they also received the Blueprints for WTC7, so the engineers that supports AE911truth, should be able to get a working model for testing.
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/611-wtc-7-blueprints-exposed-via-foia-request.html
So why do they keep insisting that they never got any information while this is clearly a lie? And why do they keep insisting in a new independent investigation, if they got all the information to do so themselves?
They got 1700+architects and engineers in their ranks, and no one is able to get a working model from the information they received? It looks like they don't want to perform a new investigation, cause that means they actually have to do some real work, and why risk doing an investigation and don't get the result they were hoping for? Are they scared to do the new investigation themselves?
So all you AE911truth followers should ask them why they are not using the information they received to do their own research.
http://cryptome.org/wtc-nist-wtc7-no.pdf
And yes, they may have withheld some information, Like the connection models, but they also received the Blueprints for WTC7, so the engineers that supports AE911truth, should be able to get a working model for testing.
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/611-wtc-7-blueprints-exposed-via-foia-request.html
So why do they keep insisting that they never got any information while this is clearly a lie? And why do they keep insisting in a new independent investigation, if they got all the information to do so themselves?
They got 1700+architects and engineers in their ranks, and no one is able to get a working model from the information they received? It looks like they don't want to perform a new investigation, cause that means they actually have to do some real work, and why risk doing an investigation and don't get the result they were hoping for? Are they scared to do the new investigation themselves?
So all you AE911truth followers should ask them why they are not using the information they received to do their own research.
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)