AE911's focus on NIST

I am amazed that AE911 keeps focusing on NIST to try to discredit the report they did on WTC7. But did you know that the NIST is not the only one who created a report on  WTC7? I guess you didn't because Gage never mentions those other reports on the collapse during his speeches. So which reports are you talking about then, you might ask.

Well in 2010 a British engineering company called ARUP also wrote a report together with the well renowned Structural Engineering professor from the University of Manchester, Colin G. Bailey.

Another structural company also did their own research in 2010, and this company is called, Guy Nordenson and Associates Structural Engineers LLP. And they got help from Frederick W. Mowrer, who is a professor at the University of Maryland, and who specializes in Fire Protection Engineering

And the reports are below.

bailey-expert-report
Mowrer
Nordenson report part 1
Nordenson report part 2

So ask Gage why he never mentions these reports, the next time you see him do one of his speeches.

Address Downtown Dubai

A couple of days ago, there was a fire in Dubai, where a Skycraper caught fire due to the fireworks. And again AE911 try to use this as proof that WTC7 did not collapse due to fire.

But there is a problem with that. First of all, it was the outer cladding that caught fire, and not the interior as in WTC7. Second of all, this building still had active fire suppression working, and WTC7 did not have that. This building was also not hit with debris from a 110 floor building next to it. So why try to compare this fire to the fire at WTC7 is beyond me tbh.

undying 9/11 MORONIC JET FUEL ARGUMENT

A few weeks ago, an ironworker put a video on youtube, where he shows how steel behaves when heated, and boy, did this get the attention of AE911!

AE911 was so pissed of, that they even created a statement on their website about it, and asked their followers to spam that statement on YouTube, beneath that video. How idiotic is that?

The most hilarious part is of course, that Richard Gage, used to do his own experiment during his lectures, which can be seen below.

And this guy has the balls to call out an ironworker on his experiment? How sad is that?

WTC 7 Evaluation

Well it seems AE911 is sponsoring an "independent" research into the collapse of WTC7.

They found a professor in Alaska who is willing to model the collapse of WTC7. He is helped by 2 of his students who do all the work, and for few months they have been updating us via video on the work they are doing. The students also have been filling out diaries, which can be found in the 1.1 gig download on their website. In one of the diaries we can read that at the end of September, they were working on the report for WTC7, and the end date states October 2. So where is the report? It's January 2 now, and still no report.

Could this be another failure of AE911 truth to prove that it was an inside job?

ANSYS Data and Blueprints received by AE911Truth

The last few weeks AE911truth keeps telling us that they never got any information to get a working model to model the WTC7 Collapse. But this is a blatant lie! They received ANSYS information from the first 16 floors in 2010.

http://cryptome.org/wtc-nist-wtc7-no.pdf

And yes, they may have withheld some information, Like the connection models, but they also received the Blueprints for WTC7, so the engineers that supports AE911truth, should be able to get a working model for testing.

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/611-wtc-7-blueprints-exposed-via-foia-request.html

So why do they keep insisting that they never got any information while this is clearly a lie? And why do they keep insisting in a new independent investigation, if they got all the information to do so themselves?

They got 1700+architects and engineers in their ranks, and no one is able to get a working model from the information they received? It looks like they don't want to perform a new investigation, cause that means they actually have to do some real work, and why risk doing an investigation and don't get the result they were hoping for? Are they scared to do the new investigation themselves?

So all you AE911truth followers should ask them why they are not using the information they received to do their own research.